Cases 41 - 50 of 59
McCarter v. King Pharmaceuticals LLC
as 3:2013cv00437
Plaintiff:
Robert E McCarter
Defendant:
King Pharmaceuticals LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
McCarter v. King Pharmaceuticals LLC
as TNE/3:13-cv-00437
Plaintiff:
Robert E McCarter
Defendant:
King Pharmaceuticals LLC
McCarter vs. Kovitz Shifrin Nesbit
as 1:2013cv03909
Plaintiff:
Janice McCarter
Defendant:
Kovitz Shifrin Nesbit, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00796
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NORTHERN TRUST BANK, FSB et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2011cv06785
Plaintiff:
NORTHERN TRUST BANK, FSB
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and McCarter & English
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
United States v. Gauntlett McCarter
as 11-3493
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Gauntlett McCarter, also known as "G"
United States of America v. Robinson (Murphy)
as 11-4357
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clayton Robinson, Maurice Bennefield, AKA Manager Mo, Jayquan Faniel, AKA Quan, AKA Q. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Eric Murphy, AKA E.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. US Department of Health
as 10-2204
Amicus Curiae:
EASTERN BANK, NATIONAL GRID USA, NATIONAL LEGAL FOUNDATION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES (DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS), KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, THOMAS E. PRICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Intervenor:
BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Adams v. St James Hospitals et al
as 1:2010cv02405
Plaintiff:
Todd Steven Adams
Defendant:
St James Hospitals, Illinois Department of Humen Services, Sonya Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
