Cases 41 - 50 of 6,841
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC v. CDG ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC
Defendant:
CDG ENTERPRISES, LLC doing business as 5TH AVENUE GRILL & BAR, JEFFREY DEES, JOSHUA GOODIN and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite Comm.
Stevens v. Stevens et al
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Coralie Jane Stevens
Defendant:
Nicole Marie Stevens, Wesley Allen Ream, Jr., Wesley Allen Ream, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Harmon v. Coleman Worldwide Moving, LLC
as 1:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Derek Kent Harmon, Sr.
Defendant:
Coleman Worldwide Moving, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11706 Carmack Amendent
USA v. Douglas
as 24-60105
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas W. Douglas, Jr. and John S. Welch, Sr.
Gregory Flynn, Sr. v. West Coast Windows and Home Improvement
as 5:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Gregory Flynn, Sr.
Defendant:
West Coast Windows and Home Improvement
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Edward Stevens, Sr. v. USA Insulation Of Akron
as 24-3143
Plaintiff:
EDWARD STEVENS, SR.
Defendant:
USA INSULATION OF AKRON
WAGNER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00272
Petitioner:
MARVIN KEVIN WAGNER, SR.
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Harris v. Daniels, et al.
as 24-878
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR., MICHAEL MINEV and others
Stewart et al v. Ladd et al
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jody Virginia Lynn Stewart, Delores Lee Robinette Reynolds and William Joseph Robinette, Sr.
Defendant:
Richard E. Ladd, Jr., Karissa H Range, Penn Stuart & Eskridge, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
