Cases 51 - 60 of 2,790
Turner v. Brown, et al.
as 24-2237
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
EDMOND G. BROWN, JR., SCOTT KERNAN, MATTHEW CATES and others
United States of America v. Brown (Battice)
as 24-884
Defendant:
QUINCY BATTICE, DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Menjivar v. Castro et al
as 0:2024cv01131
Petitioner:
Christian Alberto Mendez Menjivar
Respondent:
Deisy Rosibel Enamorado Castro and Fredis Donain Montoya Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rogers v. Pfeiffer
as 24-2037
Petitioner:
SPENCER EARL ROGERS
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden
State of Oklahoma v. HHS, et al
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY OF, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official Capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Canelas Matute, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1894
Petitioner:
YLSI ROXANA CANELAS MATUTE, CHRISTIAN YAHIR CANELAS MATUTE and WILMER DANIEL ESPINOZA CANELAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stricker v. The Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Tyler Stricker and Dale Moog
Defendant:
The Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701 Federal Communications Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
