Cases 71 - 80 of 1,357
Jamey Robertson v. , et alIn re: Jamey Robertson v. , et al
as 22-2720
Petitioner:
In re: JAMEY C. ROBERTSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Robertson v. Janoski-Haehlen et al
as 5:2022cv01652
Plaintiff:
Clark A. Robertson
Defendant:
Emily Janoski-Haehlen, Christopher J. Peters, Charles Oldfield and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States v. Jyshawn Robertson
as 22-2868
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jyshawn Robertson
Swarner et al v. Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC (JRG2)
as 3:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Bryan Swarner and Joy Swarner
Defendant:
Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ROBERTSON v. USA
as 1:2022cv01165
Plaintiff:
JOAN ROBERTSON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
USA v. Thomas Robertson
as 22-3062
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Thomas Robertson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Adee Honey Farms v. US
as 22-2105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTEREY MUSHROOMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ADEE HONEY FARMS, A. H. MEYER & SONS INC., MARK ALMETER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Robertson's Ready Mix, Ltd. et al v. Gregory M. Edwards et al
as 5:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
Robertson's Ready Mix, Ltd., RRM Properties, Ltd., Robertson's Transport, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Gregory M. Edwards, Robert E. Matje, Mervyn Y. Encarnacion and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
