Cases 71 - 80 of 88
Jerry E Stewart et al v. Brad Gates et al
as 2:1975cv03075
Defendant:
Robert W Battin, Ralph B Clark, Ralph A Diedrich and others
Plaintiff:
William Brown, Richard Eugene Smith, Jerry E Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. William Brown
as 10-3424
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM BROWN
Adams et al v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 0:2009cv03239
Plaintiff:
David Adams, David Adams, David Adams and others
Defendant:
Does 1 to 100, Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Brown
as 1:2009mi00497
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
Defendant:
William Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv14537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Type:
Other Statutes
Brown et al v. Metrou & Associates
as 1:2009cv06989
Plaintiff:
William Brown and Virgilija Brown
Defendant:
Metrou & Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
US v. Wendell Sergeant
as 09-7629
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WENDELL SERGEANT, a/k/a William Brown
Marin v. Brown et al
as 2:2009cv00563
Plaintiff:
Mel Marin
Defendant:
William Brown and National Registery Of EMTs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Brown v. Pentagroup Financial, LLC
as 4:2009cv01941
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Pentagroup Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
