Other Statutes Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 185
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party - Appellee: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00118
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00056
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00055
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dow Corning Corporation et al v. BB&T Corporation et al
as 6:2012mc06005
Plaintiff: Dow Corning Corporation and Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation
Defendant: BB&T Corporation and Scott & Stringfellow LLC
Movant: Mark S. Rogus
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1102
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Interested Party - Interested Party: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Intervenor: JOSHUA JUSTICE-POPE
Osorio v. AT & T Corporation et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN MC-11-322. DOCKETING SHOULD BE DONE IN CIVIL CASE.
as 4:2011mc00322
Plaintiff: Silvia Teresa Osorio
Defendant: AT & T Corporation and Yahoo Internet Services
Williams v. AT and T Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv10872
Plaintiff: Derrick Williams
Defendant: AT and T Corporation and Michigan Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
KB Music, Inc. et al v. Branch Banking and Trust Company et al
as 3:2011cv00007
Plaintiff: KB Music, Inc., KB Performance Plus, LLC, Blair R. Hess, Jr. and others
Defendant: Branch Banking and Trust Company and BB&T Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Campbell-Sevey, Inc. v. Delta-T Corporation et al
as 3:2010mc00029
Plaintiff: Campbell-Sevey, Inc.
Defendant: Delta-T Corporation and Bateman Litwin, N.V.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?