Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Stenson Tamaddon LLC v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
Stenson Tamaddon LLC
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service, United States of America, United States Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Southern California Emergency Medicine, Inc. v. Daniel Werfel et al
as 5:2023cv02450
Plaintiff:
Southern California Emergency Medicine, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Werfel, The United States Internal Revenue Service, Janet Yellen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
The State of Texas v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 6:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, Daniel Werfel and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Michael Bufkin v. Scottrade, Inc., et al
as 19-12003
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN KOSKINEN, Commr, Internal Revenue Service, officially and individually, SCOTTRADE, INC., apparently an Arizona corporation, officially and individually,, TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, Secretary, the Department of the Treasury, officially and individually d.b.a. U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD BUFKIN
King et al v. Sebelius et al
as 3:2013cv00630
Plaintiff:
David King , Douglas Hurst , Brenda Levy and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , United States Department of Health and Human Services , Jacob Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Haag v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013mc00034
Petitioner:
Bernard Mike Haag
Respondent:
United States of America, Daniel Werfel and Chris Wright
Hughes v. United States of America et al
as 3:2013cv05699
Plaintiff:
Willie Hughes
Defendant:
United States of America, Daniel Werfel, Jean Flannery and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
