Cases 1 - 10 of 25
US v. David Allen, Jr.
as 23-4570
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID ALLEN, JR., a/k/a David J. Allen, Jr., a/k/a Yamah Qiyamah Bey, a/k/a Kranston X
John D. Molloy et al v. Tiggle El et al
as 5:2023cv01070
Defendant:
Madalene Tiggle-Lockhart, Affiant Tiggle El, Madalene Charisse Tiggle-Lockhart and others
Plaintiff:
John D. Molloy, Charles J. Koosed, Matthew C. Perantoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cory Edwards, et al v. PJ Ops Idaho, LLC, et al
as 22-80056
Respondent:
CORY EDWARDS, JAMES HOLLINGSWORTH, MATTHEW GARBER and others
Petitioner:
PJ OPS IDAHO, LLC, PJ HOLDINGS KY, LLC, PJ OPS KANSAS, LLC and others
US v. David Allen
as 21-7483
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID EUGENE ALLEN
United States v. David Allen
as 21-3060
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
David Leroy Allen
Brown Investment Advisory & Trust Company v. David Allen
as 21-1472
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIZABETH KEY, DAVID T. ALLEN and DR. JOSEPH P. ALLEN, IV
Intervenor Defendant:
DAVID CHRISTOPHER ALLEN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BROWN INVESTMENT ADVISORY & TRUST COMPANY
Allen v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00291
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
David Henry Allen
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Ryder Systems, Inc. v. Charleston Aluminum Transportation, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00718
Plaintiff:
Ryder Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Charleston Aluminum Transportation, LLC and David E. Allen
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2702
In re: David Allen
as 17-1131
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID ERIC ALLEN
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
ALLEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2016cv01883
Petitioner:
DAVID ERIC ALLEN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
