Other Statutes Cases
Boe et al v. Marshall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff: Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant: Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: United States of America
Amicus Curiae: State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner: Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brandt et al v. Rutledge et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00450
Defendant: Amy E Embry, William L Rutledge, Edward Gardner and others
Plaintiff: Lacey Jennen, Dylan Brandt, Amanda Dennis and others
Amicus Curiae: American Academy of Pediatrics, Academic Pediatric Association, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Skyworks, Ltd., et al v Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv02407
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, Nina B. Witkofsky and others
Plaintiff: Cedarwood Village Apartments I & II Owner B, LLC, Monarch Investment and Management Group, Toledo Properties Owner B, LLC and others
Petitioner: Julia Raifman, Sabriya A Linton, Community Legal Aid Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
WHITMAN-WALKER CLINIC, INC. et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01630
Plaintiff: WARD CARPENTER, MD, AGLP: THE ASSOCIATION OF LGBTQ PSYCHIATRISTS, BRADBURY-SULLIVAN LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II, SEEMA VERMA, ROGER SEVERINO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
County of Santa Clara, et al v. HHS, et al
as 20-15399
Plaintiff / Appellee: TRUST WOMEN SEATTLE, MEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE, BRADBURY-SULLIVAN LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
County of Santa Clara et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2019cv02916
Plaintiff: Trust Women Seattle, Medical Students For Choice, Bradbury-Sullivan LGBT Community Center and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar, II
Amicus Curiae: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Institute for Policy Integrity
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Essential Access Health, Inc., et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-15979
Plaintiff / Appellee: ESSENTIAL ACCESS HEALTH, INC. and MELISSA MARSHALL, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant: ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Amicus Curiae: SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, EQUALITY FEDERATION, FAMILY EQUALITY COUNCIL, GLMA: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ADVANCING LGBTQ EQUALITY, THE HIV MEDICINE ASSOCIATION, THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER EQUALITY, THE NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE, THE SEXU, AMERICANS UNITED FOR LIFE and others
State of California v. Alex Azar, II, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-15974
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra
Amicus Curiae: SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, EQUALITY FEDERATION, FAMILY EQUALITY COUNCIL, GLMA: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ADVANCING LGBTQ EQUALITY, THE HIV MEDICINE ASSOCIATION, THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER EQUALITY, THE NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE, THE SEXU and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?