Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,640
US v. Randolph Hunt
as 24-4255
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RANDOLPH HUNT
Williams, et al. v. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
as 24-2970
Plaintiff: WILLIE WILLIAMS, LADON CLINE and PAUL CONTRERAS
Defendant: J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Portland Hunt-Alpine Club, LLC v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01560
Defendant: United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative, ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Portland Hunt-Alpine Club, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hunt v. Noeth
as 24-1094
Plaintiff: CLIFTON HUNT
Defendant: PATRICIA CIULLA, Deputy Warden for Attica Correctional Facility, JOSEPH H. NOETH, Warden for Attica Correctional Facility, JOHN/JANE DOES and others
Quandel Construction Group, Inc. v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01899
Plaintiff: Quandel Construction Group, Inc.
Defendant: Hunt Construction Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
United States v. Hunt
as 24-1159
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: STEPHEN VINCENT HUNT
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant: MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party: GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
ZEATH et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff: KAMAL ZEATH, FATHIMA RASHFA RAHMAN and ZIDAN AHMED ZEATH
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, BAXTER HUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party: GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?