Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Julie Munford v. Andrew Saul
as 19-1537
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIE S. MUNFORD
BIEDERMAN v. CALGON CARBON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv01459
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL BIEDERMAN
Defendant:
CALGON CARBON CORPORATION, RANDALL S. DEARTH, J. RICH ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mitchell v. Calgon Carbon Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv01572
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mitchell
Defendant:
Calgon Carbon Corporation, Randall S. Dearth, Timothy Glenn Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
ASSAD v. CALGON CARBON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv01433
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ASSAD
Defendant:
CALGON CARBON CORPORATION , J. RICH ALEXANDER , RANDALL S. DEARTH and others
Mediator:
ARTHUR H. STROYD
Plaintiff_consolidated:
MARSHALL BIEDERMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Juan Sandoval et al v. David M. Lanier et al
as 5:2016cv02309
Defendant:
Christine Baker, Christine Baker, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Magana and Juan Sandoval
LITWIN v. WILLIAM SMOOT ANTLE et al
as 2:2016cv01569
Plaintiff:
HAROLD LITWIN
Defendant:
WILLIAM SMOOT ANTLE, III, GEORGE BABICH, JR., STEPHEN N. DAVID and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Williams v. Sebelius et al
as 8:2013cv00458
Plaintiff:
Julie S. Williams
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and Patricia Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bolling et al v. United States of America
as 3:2011cv02971
Plaintiff:
Leslie J. Bolling and Julie S Bolling
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis v. Solomon & Solomon, P.C. et al
as 1:2010mc00017
Plaintiff:
Janet Ellis
Defendant:
Solomon & Solomon, P.C., Julie S. Farina and Douglas Fisher
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
