Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Robertson v. QC Franchise Group LLC et al
as 3:2023cv03333
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. Robertson
Defendant:
QC Franchise Group LLC doing business as QC Kinetix, Regenerative Health of Champaign, LLC doing business as QC Kinetix - Champaign, Med-Den Funding, LLC doing business as Proceed Finance and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
John Zink Company, LLC v. Robertson
as 4:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
John Zink Company, LLC
Defendant:
Todd M Robertson
Lavin et al v. Practice Protection Fund et al
as 2:2019cv11348
Defendant:
GERALD M ROBINSON, Practice Protection Fund, American Express Underwriters, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Thomas, James A Leithead, III, Thomas E Lavin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Robertson v. United States Government
as 1:2017cv11164
Plaintiff:
James M. Robertson
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robertson v. US Federal Government
as 16-1673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. ROBERTSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Tremblay, et al v. Superior Court, et al
as 16-1311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIZABETH TREMBLAY and JAMES M. ROBERTSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT and JUDGE COSGROVE
Robertson, Jr v. U.S Federal Goverment et al
as 1:2015cv10432
Plaintiff:
James M Robertson, Jr
Defendant:
U.S Federal Goverment and Donald Sutherland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01906
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , San Diego County, California, San Diego County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
