Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Atas v. The New York Times Company
as 24-58
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DEAN BAQUET, ELLEN POLLOCK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NADIRE ATAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
The Siegfried Group, LLP v. Milas
as 1:2023cv15264
Plaintiff:
The Siegfried Group, LLP
Defendant:
Jeffrey Milas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02578
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Balbin et al v. Vertical Staffing Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv07332
Plaintiff:
Michael Balbin, Mila Cruz, Rova Cruz and others
Defendant:
Vertical Staffing Corporation, Vertical Staffings, Jeffrey Samonte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wayde Milas v. Robert Avena et al
as 2:2022cv03955
Petitioner:
Wayde Milas
Respondent:
Robert Avena and Danny Avena
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Hamido et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2022cv11081
Plaintiff:
Nidal Hamido, Rima Berro and Mila Bella Hamido
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chicago Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Clarke v. Newsom et al
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Eleni Kounalakis, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AVENA v. MILAS
as 1:2022cv01362
Plaintiff:
ROBERT AVENA
Defendant:
WAYDE MILAS
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
