Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Stefani v. Longhorn et al
as 2:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Mr. Thomas Eugene Stefani and Thomas Eugene Stefani
Defendant:
Daniel Allen Longhorn and Edward Alfred Longhorn, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grant v. PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC et al
as 9:2022cv04262
Plaintiff:
Terry Lennette Grant
Defendant:
PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC, Peter Wolf, Esq, WOLF & MOGIL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hunter v. Graham et al
as 0:2022cv00773
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter
Respondent:
Lindsey Graham, Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Earls-Rozelle v. Chorle et al
as 1:2021cv06793
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Laretta Earls-Rozelle and Laretta Earls-Rozelle
Defendant:
Mr. Erhard R. Chorle, Mr. John Bragg, Mr. Thomas R. Jayne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Joel Muir v. Wetzel, et al
as 21-3145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL GLASTON MUIR
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. J. HALL, MR. J FREEMAN and others
Rodriguez v. Barr
as 20-3917
Respondent:
Michael Ball, SDDO, Mr. William P. Barr, United States Attorney General, Mr. Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention Removal and others
Petitioner:
Olvin Geovany Rodriguez
Wright-El v. Thomas
as 20-3682
Petitioner / Appellant:
Cush Ajelya Wright-El, AKA James Joseph Owens-El
Respondent / Appellee:
Matthew A. Sciarrino, Jr., State of New York, Kendra L. Hutchinson, State of New York and others
In Re: Cush Ajelya Wright-El
as 20-1200
Respondent:
Mr. Thomas, Warden, Matthew A. Sciarrino, Jr., State of New York, Governor Andrew Cuomo, State of New York and others
Petitioner:
Cush Ajelya Wright-El, AKA James Joseph Owens-El
Wu v. Kallies et al
as 1:2019cv08388
Defendant:
Mr. Thomas Kallies, Southern Cross Resources Group, Inc., Jeffrey Pozen and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alan Wu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
