Cases 1 - 10 of 42
David Jaroslawicz, et al v. M&T Bank Corp, et al
as 23-8038
Respondent:
BELINA FAMILY and JEFF KRUBLIT
Petitioner:
M&T BANK CORP, HUDSON CITY BANCORP INC, ROBERT G. WILMERS and others
South Carolina Freedom Caucus v. Jordan et al
as 3:2023cv00795
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Freedom Caucus
Defendant:
Wallace H. Jordan, Jr., J. David Weeks, Beth E. Bernstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CICCOTELLI v. TCF FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv01205
Defendant:
DAVID T PROVOST, ARTHUR A WEISS, VANCE K OPPERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Gallo v. TCF Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv10549
Defendant:
Barbara J. Mahone, Ronald A. Klein, David T. Provost and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gallo
Curtis v. TCF Financial Corporation et al
as 5:2021cv10545
Defendant:
Barbara J. Mahone, Ronald A. Klein, David T. Provost and others
Plaintiff:
Marcy Curtis
Osterhout v. TCF Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00403
Defendant:
Barbara J. Mahone, Ronald A. Klein, David T. Provost and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Osterhout
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
USA v. Richard King
as 20-17349
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD ALAN KING, AKA William Wallace Keegan
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Laddy Valentine, et al v. Bryan Collier, et al
as 20-20525
Defendant / Appellant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Robert Herrera and Bryan Collier
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Laddy Curtis Valentine and Richard Elvin King
Amicus Curiae:
Sojourners, Erik K.J. Gronberg, Reverend, Witness Against Torture and others
Druzbik v. Went et al
as 3:2020cv02320
Defendant:
Mardi C. Dier, Richard A. King, Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James Druzbik
Van Camp v. Went et al
as 3:2020cv01815
Defendant:
Went, Mardi C. Dier, Richard A. King and others
Plaintiff:
Van Camp and Patrick Van Camp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
