Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Ortega v. Priority Contracting and Roofing LLC
as 5:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Mark Ortega
Defendant:
Priority Contracting and Roofing LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ford v. Farha Roofing, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Brianna Ford
Defendant:
Farha Roofing, LLC and Farha Roofing KC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Secretary United States Department of Labor v. Avilas Roofing LLC
as 23-1985
Petitioner:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Respondent:
AVILAS ROOFING LLC
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv01413
Plaintiff:
Kinsale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Modern Commercial & Residential Roofing, LLC, Guadalupe Marquez, Vicenta Ventura and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
SOL v. Michael Krueger
as 23-3291
Petitioner:
SECRETARY OF LABOR
Respondent:
MICHAEL KRUEGER, dba Altogether Roofing, LLC, and its successors
Cacho v. Sunbility LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cacho
Defendant:
Sunbility LLC, Sunbility Solar and Roofing, LLC, Montherclubber, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
BACCARO v. APPROVED ROOFING LLC
as 2:2022cv04955
Plaintiff:
FRANK L BACCARO
Defendant:
APPROVED ROOFING LLC
ABRAMSON v. ONE DAY ROOFING, LLC
as 2:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEWART ABRAMSON
Defendant:
ONE DAY ROOFING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hudson Excess Insurance Company v. Theta Beta Sigma Programs and Housing Foundation et al
as 2:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Hudson Excess Insurance Company
Defendant:
Theta Beta Sigma Programs and Housing Foundation, CMR Construction & Roofing, LLC, Home Bank, N.A. and others
Cross Defendant:
Alpha Gamma Zeta Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Thomas v. One Day Roofing LLC
as 3:2021cv00643
Plaintiff:
Dana Thomas
Defendant:
One Day Roofing LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
