Cases 1 - 10 of 408
Leishman v. Washington Office of the Attorney General, et al.
as 24-2509
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEISHMAN
Defendant:
WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, SHANE ESQUIBEL, ELIZABETH CHRISTINA BEUSCH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shepherd v. Regan
as 23-11189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Shepherd, Trustee for the James B. Shepard Trust and New Millennium Concepts, Limited
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael S. Regan, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Christine Tokarz and others
Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Baker Botts L.L.P.
as 23-7753
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO
Defendant / Appellee:
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P., RICHARD B. HARPER, Esq., ROBERT LAWRENCE MAIRER, Esq. and others
Defendant:
MASSAU COUNTY CLERK, Supreme Court of New York
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GLOVER v. FEIN, SUCH, KAHN & SHEPARD, P.C. et al
as 2:2023cv22282
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH A. GLOVER
Defendant:
FEIN, SUCH, KAHN & SHEPARD, P.C., N.A.R., INC. and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shepard v. General Motors, LLC
as 4:2023cv00961
Plaintiff:
Conrad Shepard
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Shepard v. Roxbury SSA Office
as 1:2023cv11265
Plaintiff:
David J Shepard
Defendant:
Roxbury SSA Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Toth Enterprises II, P.A et al v. Forage et al
as 1:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Toth Enterprises II, P.A doing business as Victory Medical & Family Care, Dr William Franklin, DO Katherine Keller and others
Defendant:
Jean-Pierre Forage, Lewis Nichols, Clay Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
