Immigration Cases filed in Pennsylvania matching "S"
Cases 221 - 230 of 846,121
The United Daughters of the Confederacy, Inc. v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00770
Plaintiff: The United Daughters of the Confederacy, Inc.
Defendant: Lloyd J. Austin, The United States Department of the Army, Jessica D. Aber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01938
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Real Property Known As 8801 W Snoqualmie Valley Road NE, Carnation, Washington, et al.
as 2:2024cv01791
Defendant: Real Property Known As 8801 W Snoqualmie Valley Road NE, Carnation, Washington, et al.
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Cobblestone Hotels, LLC v. Platteville Lodging WI, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00774
Defendant: Platteville Lodging WI, LLC and Parth Patel
Plaintiff: Cobblestone Hotels, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv01791
Plaintiff: TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Barrett Tunsil v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 24-3023
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff: BARRETT S. TUNSIL
US v. Daqua Ritter
as 24-4576
Defendant: DAQUA LAMEEK RITTER, a/k/a Quavo
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Murillo
as 24-10967
Defendant: Balentin Martinez Murillo, Jr.
Plaintiff: United States of America
Derek Leigh v. Adam Douglas
as 24-1959
Petitioner: DEREK M. LEIGH
Respondent: ADAM DOUGLAS, Warden
United States v. Mohamed Ismail
as 24-3203
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Mohamed Jama Ismail

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?