Cases 51 - 60 of 60
fritz et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01026
Plaintiff:
Lisa Fritz and Patrick Fritz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01029
Plaintiff:
Kathy Robertson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv01772
Plaintiff:
Tina L. Young and Jeffrey Young
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2012cv01322
Plaintiff:
Tina L Young and Jeffrey Young
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glasgow v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00945
Plaintiff:
Carol Glasgow
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saurino et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Penelope Saurino and Dan Saurino
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thaman et al v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 2:2011cv14390
Plaintiff:
Susan Thaman and Robert Thaman, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01768
Plaintiff:
Terrie S Gregory and Ralph R Gregory, Jr
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2010cv00581
Plaintiff:
Shelley Bates and Kevin Bates
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bates et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2010cv02139
Plaintiff:
Shelley Bates and Kevin Bates
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
