Cases 71 - 80 of 243
John Peterson v. Valentine Enterprises, et al
as 17-35734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ARTHUR PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
VALENTINE ENTERPRISES and REX B. VALENTINE
Peterson et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2017cv05137
Plaintiff:
Michael Peterson and Toni Peterson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. Valentine Enterprises et al
as 3:2017cv05609
Plaintiff:
John Arthur Peterson
Defendant:
Valentine Enterprises and Rex B Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barker et al v. OneWest Bank et al
as 1:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
James L. Barker and Jeanne A. Barker
Defendant:
OneWest Bank , CIT Bank, N.A. , First American Title Company of Montana, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Rieger et al v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv01141
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rieger , Mark Rieger , Margaret Rieger Peterson and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Peterson v. Zions Bank et al
as 2:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Brandon Peterson
Defendant:
Zions Bank and Halliday Watkins & Mann
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0191
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Peterson et al
as 3:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc
Defendant:
Verna J Peterson, Skylar Hamel and Brieanna Hamel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barker et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
James L. Barker and Jeanne A. Barker
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , Onewest Bank, Cit Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
United States of America v. Peterson et al
as 1:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Karen S Peterson and Scott Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Robert Peterson v. Bank of America NA
as 4:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
Robert Peterson
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
