Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Alexander v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mary Alexander
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. , WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP , ARAMARK Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cannon v. Flowers Bakery of Montgomery, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00749
Plaintiff:
James Cannon
Defendant:
Flowers Bakery of Montgomery, LLC and Aramark Facility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABEL v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 3:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. ABEL
Defendant:
ARAMARK BUSINESS & INDUSTRY, LLC, ARAMARK CORPORATION, ARAMARK FACILITY SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kyoumijran v. ARAMARK Facility Services, LLC
as 4:2012cv01025
Plaintiff:
Antranik Kyoumijran
Defendant:
ARAMARK Facility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shantillo v. Aramark Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv00550
Plaintiff:
Marianne Shantillo
Defendant:
Aramark Corp., Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC , Aramark Aviation Services Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Finn v. Aramark Facility Services, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
Margaret M. Finn
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Services, LLC and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ingrassia et al v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02430
Plaintiff:
Nora Ingrassia and Anthony Ingrassia
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., Aramark Aviation Services, Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lowman et al v. Wick et al
as 1:2008cv00867
Plaintiff:
David K. Lowman, David K. Lowman, Loretta Lowman and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey C Wick, Aramark Cleanroom Services, Inc., Aramark Cleanroom Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
