Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Hershberger et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00730
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Arlene Hershberger and Dale Hershberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERSHBERGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00463
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HERSHBERGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03082
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HAHN, AMORRIS CONLEY, JONATHAN STARK and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hicks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02092
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hahn, Amorris Conley, Jonathan Stark and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
HERSHBERGER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv01744
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HERSHBERGER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERSHBERGER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv08337
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC")
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HERSHBERGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hershberger v. The Long Island Railroad Company
as 2:2017cv04104
Plaintiff:
Michael Hershberger
Defendant:
The Long Island Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Glassburn et al v. Apex Parks Group LLC
as 4:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Glassburn and Delmarie M Hershberger
Defendant:
Apex Parks Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hershberger v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
Allison Hershberger
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barber et al v. Cordis Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv03086
Plaintiff:
Michael Barber , Andrew Clos , Jacquelyn Hanson and others
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Cardinal Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
