Cases 21 - 30 of 14,447
Catlett et al v. Norman et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Chris James Catlett and Samantha Ann Catlett
Defendant:
Norman Joe Sturgill and Kimberly Sturgill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
VanMeter v. Kroger LP
as 4:2024cv01691
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann VanMeter
Defendant:
Kroger LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Portell v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv20975
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Portell
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Ruocco v. Covidien, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11185
Plaintiff:
Dorian Ann Ruocco
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stephanie Ann Thomas v. Sprouts Farmers Market Texas, LP
as 7:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Ann Thomas
Defendant:
Sprouts Farmers Market Texas LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gill v. Goncalves Foernges, MD. et al
as 4:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Maria Gill
Defendant:
Luiz Goncalves Foernges, MD., Anne Theresa Lunney, MD., Matthew Scott Factor, MD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Blackmon et al v. Garcia-Hernandez
as 8:2024cv02701
Plaintiff:
Austin Blackmon and Ann Blackmon
Defendant:
Vicente Jose Garcia-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
C. Holmes v. Anne Milgram
as 24-1231
Plaintiff:
C. HOLMES, a/k/a C. Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Collie Holmes, M.D.
Defendant:
ANNE MILGRAM, Administrator of DEA
Christina Vazquez-Klecha v. Michael Neely, et al
as 24-10719
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA NECOLE VAZQUEZ-KLECHA
Defendant:
MICHAEL NEELY
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE and ELIZABETH ANN BICKERSTAFF
Andracchio v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Lee Anne Andracchio
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
