Cases 21 - 30 of 47
JONES v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01023
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. JONES
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv01878
Plaintiff:
Charles K. Jones
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Maximum Transportation Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Charles K Jones and Pam Jones
Defendant:
Maximum Transportation Inc and RC Browing, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Jones et al
as 5:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tilford Taylor
Defendant:
Charles Blaise Jones , Don Keith Ferguson and South Central Medical and Resource Center Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00268
Plaintiff:
Marcella Jones and Charles Morgan Jones
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yun v. Lowe et al
as 3:2015cv01640
Plaintiff:
Gloria Sun Jung Yun
Defendant:
Brien Lowe, Anthony J. Alexander and Charles E. Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv13099
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Jones
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Jones
as 4:2013cv02251
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Jones and Anne V. Jones
Defendant:
Charles F. Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Zyndorf et al
as 3:2012cv01490
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Jones
Defendant:
Sol Zyndorf and Law Offices of Rubin and Zyndorf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59196
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
