Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Samuelson-Devault v. Hospira Worldwide, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv11694
Defendant:
Hospira Worldwide, LLC and Hospira, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Samuelson-Devault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAMUELSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv02066
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD SAMUELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. Chally et al
as 3:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
Ava Gordon
Defendant:
Amy Chally, Dick Haroldson and Geraldean Samuelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samuelson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Barbara Samuelson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samuelson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 0:2017cv00155
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lori Samuelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samuelson v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2015cv15467
Plaintiff:
Joyce Samuelson
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newhoff et al v. R.J. Corman Railroad Group, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
Darlee Newhoff and Jacqueline Newhoff
Defendant:
R.J. Corman Railroad Group, LLC, James Samuelson, John Doe 1 - X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Samuelson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09550
Plaintiff:
Beth Ann Samuelson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samuelson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07371
Plaintiff:
Miriam Samuelson and Carl Samuelson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trenisha Justina McGee v. L A County Dept of Children and Family Services et al
as 2:2015cv01205
Plaintiff:
Trenisha Justina McGee
Defendant:
L A County Dept of Children and Family Services, Liza M Samuelson, S Canda Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
