Cases 21 - 30 of 68
MENDOZA et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv02228
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
JESUS MENDOZA and VANESSA MENDOZA
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Madrigal de Mendoza et al
as 4:2019cv05181
Defendant:
Teresa Barrera, Liliana Alvarez Torres, Andrea Salazar and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
USA v. Raymond Camacho
as 19-35488
Defendant / Appellant:
RAYMOND CAMACHO, AKA Jesus Mendoza-Nunez, AKA Jesus Felician Mendoza-Nunez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Steakhouse Seattle, LLC et al v. United States
as 3:2018cv05751
Defendant:
Annette L. Hayes, Sonny Perdue, Jefferson B Sessions and others
Plaintiff:
James Nations and Steakhouse Seattle, LLC
Jesus Mendoza Rosales v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71206
Petitioner:
JESUS MENDOZA ROSALES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Felipe de Jesus Mendoza v. Loretta Lynch
as 17-1006
Petitioner:
FELIPE DE JESUS MOLINA MENDOZA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
USA v. Raymond Camacho
as 16-30290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND CAMACHO, AKA Jesus Mendoza-Nunez
Henderson v. Mendoza
as 2:2016cv00402
Plaintiff:
Robert Henderson
Defendant:
Jesus Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cesar Vega-Munoz v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-60677
Petitioner:
CESAR VEGA-MUNOZ, also known as Edgar Jesus Mendoza, also known as Luis Angel Garcia-Gonzalez
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
