Cases 31 - 40 of 104
Grove et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2019cv01418
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mathers and Janet Grove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mather v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05171
Plaintiff:
Brian Mather and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mather v. Tebay
as 6:2019cv00075
Plaintiff:
Natalie Mather
Defendant:
Corey Tebay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Mather v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 6:2019cv01261
Plaintiff:
Patricia Mather
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, John Doe(s) and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as AMTRAK
Not Classified By Court:
James Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Muhammad v. YouTube LLC et al
as 5:2019cv03083
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Larry Page, Diane B. Greene and others
Plaintiff:
Yakub Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mather v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv06761
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gloria Mather
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mather v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03156
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Nicole Mather
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhammad v. YouTube LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00836
Defendant:
Larry Page, Alphabet Inc., YouTube LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Yakub Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathers v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2018cv11808
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Beverly Mathers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mather v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00822
Plaintiff:
Nicole Mather
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
