Cases 41 - 50 of 1,556
Lane v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01468
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Lane
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Lane v. Boston Children's Hospital, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, SARAH SCHLEGEL, PHA Doctor and TAMARA, HIV/AIDS Specialist
Lane v. Boston Public Schools, et al
as 23-1877
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. K-8 SCHOOL, SCHOOLS TECHBOSTON ACADEMY and others
Allen v. Lane Bryant, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Rodney Allen
Defendant:
Lane Bryant Brands OpCo, LLC, Lane Bryant, Inc. and Apparel Holding Partnership, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Lane v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03758
Plaintiff:
Tonette Lane
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03538
Plaintiff:
Anna Lane
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lantigua-Nunez et al v. United States Coast Guard et al
as 3:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Mr. Juan Jose Lantigua-Nunez, Mr. Joffrey Bagwell and Mr. Pardeep Chacha
Defendant:
United States Coast Guard, Mr. Mikael M Allert, Mr. Matthew B Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
BRADLEY v. BORGHESE LANE, LLC
as 2:2023cv01985
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRADLEY
Defendant:
BORGHESE LANE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
TUNSTALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24331
Plaintiff:
LANE TUNSTALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dunton v. Hein et al
as 1:2023cv08792
Plaintiff:
Equanna Tashona Dunton
Defendant:
Charity Hein, Obsidian Lane Services LLC and Roger Forrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
