Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Bernardette Cortez v. Phillip Michael Adams et al
as 2:2019cv08311
Defendant:
GCB Logistics, Inc., DOES 1 to 30, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. C R Bard Incorporated et al.
as 2:2019cv00927
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Michael Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al.
as 1:2019cv00085
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2018cv03625
Plaintiff:
Michael Adams
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Monsanto Company
as 5:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michael Adams
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATCHLEY et al v. ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED et al
as 1:2017cv02136
Plaintiff:
AMY RITCHIE, BRENDA CHAND, JEAN DAMMANN and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS LLC, ETHICON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331
Adams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03973
Plaintiff:
Michael Adams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaz Rodgers v. Lancaster Police & Fire Dept, et al
as 17-10250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAZ Z. RODGERS, Individually
Defendant - Appellee:
LANCASTER POLICE & FIRE DEPARTMENT, METHODIST DALLAS HOSPITAL, JAMES SKACH, Officer and others
Estate of Michael Adams, Sr. et al v. Hotel Des Moines, L.P. et al
as 4:2016cv00552
Plaintiff:
Estate of Michael Adams, Sr. , Virginia Adams , Michael Adams, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Hotel Des Moines, L.P. and Schulte Hospitality Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. BELL et al
as 7:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON and JACQUELYN JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRANDEN BELL, BRIAN BELL, RICK BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
