Cases 51 - 60 of 129
JONES v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL)
as 2:2017cv01144
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. JONES
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL)
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
Carpenter et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00846
Plaintiff:
Derek Carpenter , Ray Massey , Robert Bassett and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
Nolieda V Jones and Robert C Jones
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Cracker Barrell Old Country Store
as 3:2015cv00954
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Jones
Defendant:
Cracker Barrell Old Country Store
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Pfizer
as 1:2015cv06772
Plaintiff:
Robert A Jones
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2015cv04469
Plaintiff:
Robert F Jones
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbott Laboratories, Besins Healthcare Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
Robert L Jones and Gwendolyn E Miller-Jones
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29835
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E. Jones and Robert R. Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Jones
as 1:2014cv00981
Defendant:
Robert Michael Jones
Plaintiff:
Amanda K. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jones v. Caesar Guerini, U.S.A., LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00255
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Jones
Defendant:
Caesar Guerini, U.S.A., LLC and Larry Albright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
