Cases 81 - 90 of 4,700
Ennis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05389
Plaintiff:
Lisa K. Ennis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ENNIS v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01889
Plaintiff:
LISA K. ENNIS
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Datta v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv00601
Plaintiff:
Christopher Datta
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. , Frantz Simeon, M.D. , Sonja Carstens, ARNP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Karns et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv00370
Plaintiff:
Ennis D Karns and Michael Karns
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ennis v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00624
Plaintiff:
Michael Ennis
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc. and Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ennis v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv26950
Plaintiff:
Marsha Ennis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee, Jr. v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv12951
Plaintiff:
Ennis Lee, Jr.
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pepin et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv02683
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff:
Ennis M Pepin and Joseph L Pepin, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ennis v. Anthem, et al
as 14-6118
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM CHARLES ENNIS
Defendant - Appellant:
CODY ALAN ANTHEM
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellant:
ROACH SERVICES, INC. and HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Nesbitt et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00976
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
LaMondre Nesbitt , Linda Gunn , Jeffrey Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
