Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,254
RUSSO et al v. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03024
Defendant: SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., EATON ELECTRICAL, INC., GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. and others
Plaintiff: FRANK C. RUSSO and HANNAH RUSSO
Counter Defendant: DOW SILICONES CORPORATION and GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC.
Respondent: ABB, INC.
Petitioner: COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Farris et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv04186
Defendant: IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.), BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC individually and as successor-in-interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION) and others
Plaintiff: MELVA FARRIS and GARY FARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Klopman-Baerselman et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv05536
Defendant: Borg Warner Morse Tec, LLC, Viking Pump, Inc., Standard Motor Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Eric Klopman-Baerselman, Rudie Klopman-Baerselman and Muriel Klopman-Baerselman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ayotte v. The Boeing Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02662
Defendant: The Boeing Company , A.W. Chesterton Company, H.B. Fuller Company and others
Plaintiff: Daniel L Ayotte
Cross_claimant: The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company , The Toro Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_defendant: Daniel L Ayotte , United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC and others
Counter_claimant: Industrial Holdings Corporation , MTD Products, Inc. and Tenneco, Inc.
Counter_defendant: United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC , Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gichner et al v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01071
Plaintiff: David Gichner and Carol Gichner
Defendant: Arvinmeritor, Inc. , Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC , Carlisle Companies Incorporated and others
Cross_claimant: DCo LLC and Eaton Corporation
Cross_defendant: DCo LLC , Arvinmeritor, Inc. , Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. Southern Design and Mechanical, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01020
Plaintiff: Leonard Rogers
Defendant: Southern Design and Mechanical, Inc. , Graco, Inc. , Nibco, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Southern Design and Mechanical, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Graco, Inc. , Nibco, Inc. and Southern Design and Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carnes et al v. The Boeing Company et al
as 4:2018cv00777
Defendant: Aerojet General Corporation, The Boeing Company, pratt & whitney Engine Services Inc and others
Plaintiff: Arthur Carnes and ada carnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Varney et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv05105
Plaintiff: Donald Varney and Maria Varney
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Alfa Laval Inc , Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Varney et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01902
Plaintiff: Donald Varney and Maria Varney
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc , Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv00144
Plaintiff: James Edward Moore
Defendant: Curtiss-Wright Corporation , Dana Companies, LLC , Eaton Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?