Cases 1 - 10 of 1,772
Reynolds v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02511
Plaintiff:
Carla A. Reynolds
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Patton v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Carla Patton
Defendant:
Bryant Jones and Smile Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Herring v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05335
Plaintiff:
Carla Herring
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Softsheen-Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hood v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Carla Hood
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and Horizon Bank Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Yameen v. CPD et al
as 1:2024cv04487
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Yameen
Defendant:
CPD, JJ Watkins, R. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04433
Plaintiff:
Carla Brooks
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bouvier et al
as 3:2024cv30071
Plaintiff:
Carla Bouvier
Defendant:
Office Of Appellate Operations,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Queen Anne's County, Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01333
Plaintiff:
Donald Jones
Defendant:
Queen Anne's County, Maryland, Warden/Director Lamonte Cooke, Sgt. Daniel Andrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Dawson v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11217
Plaintiff:
Carla Dawson
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Top 40 Express Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Carla Wilson
Defendant:
Top 40 Express Inc. and Gregory Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
