Cases 1 - 10 of 21,217
Brooks v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02132
Plaintiff:
Hugh G. Brooks
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Molineaux v. V.A. Conroe Outpatient Clinic
as 4:2024cv02095
Plaintiff:
Phillip G Molineaux
Defendant:
V.A. Conroe Outpatient Clinic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Baker v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Rebecca G. Baker
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Randolph v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02087
Plaintiff:
Emma G. Randolph
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Briones et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Irving Alexis Briones, Ariadna Rossell Urbina, Emma Leticia Garcia Morales and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jordan v. Evans et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Stephan W. Jordan
Defendant:
Kenneth G. Evans, Ingram Logging Inc. and Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Legan et al v. BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Rosie Legan and Tommy G Dotson
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION, BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHOOL BOARD, COLUMBUS NORTH HIGH SCHOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Harper et al v. G ROCK TRANS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02367
Plaintiff:
Francis Harper, Heather Harper, Michael Blumberg and others
Defendant:
G ROCK TRANS, INC. and Gurpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mann v. B&G Pipeline Company
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Mann, Jr.
Defendant:
B&G Pipeline Company
Robbie Plyler v. Russell Cox
as 24-1488
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE G. PLYLER and DEBORAH PLYLER
Defendant:
COX BROTHERS FARMS, a North Carolina general partnership, RUSSELL F. COX, DELANO S. COX and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
