Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bailey v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00067
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kristi G Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv10972
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. BAILEY and THE ESTATE OF ZORA Z. BAILEY
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04029
Plaintiff:
Kristi G Bailey
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMILLERI v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv03897
Plaintiff:
DINAH M. CAMILLERI
Defendant:
WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., MICHAEL G. BAILEY, JANE DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Prince George's County Maryland et al
as 8:2015cv01731
Plaintiff:
Noel G. Bailey
Defendant:
Prince George's County Maryland and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cross_claimant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cross_defendant:
Prince George's County Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bailey v. Pfizer Inc.
as 2:2014cv00909
Plaintiff:
Tamala G Bailey
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Pfizer Inc.
as 2:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
Tamala G Bailey
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. USA
as 8:2012cv01907
Plaintiff:
Johnny G. Bailey
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bailey, et al v. Choh,
as 1:2012cv00947
Plaintiff:
Pamela G. Bailey and William W. Bailey
Defendant:
Tim Choh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. S&S Recovery Services, LLC
as 1:2008cv00600
Plaintiff:
Orville G. Bailey
Defendant:
S&S Recovery Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
