Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Neubel et al v. Hamilton County Hospital Authority et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Juanita Neubel and Michelle Neubel
Defendant:
Hamilton County Hospital Authority doing business as Erlanger Health System, Ryan Y Lam, Kelly M Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
STOKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv11826
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARTRINA M STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv70822
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARTRINA M STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stokes v. Liberty Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv13217
Plaintiff:
Pearl M. Stokes
Defendant:
Liberty Industries, Inc. and Unifirst Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWNE v. STOKES
as 1:2014cv01682
Plaintiff:
SUSAN N. BROWNE
Defendant:
WILMA M. STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stokes v. Target Corporation
as 3:2012cv01023
Plaintiff:
Ebony M. Stokes and Marcus Stokes
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Stokes et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22195
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Stokes and Diana L. Stokes
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George Stokes v. Southern States Cooperative
as 10-3307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George M. Stokes
Defendant - Appellee:
Southern States Cooperative Inc.
Stokes v. Cassady
as 2:2010cv00078
Defendant:
Brittany L. Cassady
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth M. Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
STOKES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51907
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE M. STOKES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
