Cases 1 - 10 of 26,622
Monzon v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
Raul Cardenas Monzon
Defendant:
United States of America and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Preston v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
Alexis Preston
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 7:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Ira Jerel Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Johns v. United States of America et al
as 0:2024cv01892
Plaintiff:
Nicole Johns
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Interior, Indian Bureau of Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Morgan v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
John Robert Morgan
Defendant:
United States of America
Payton v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Marvin Christopher Payton
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Eagal v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Eagal
Defendant:
United States of America
Campbell v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
Candice Lindsay Campbell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
J v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv03035
Plaintiff:
J J
Defendant:
United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons and Fraser Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ji et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03631
Plaintiff:
Quanyue Ji
Defendant:
United States of America, Christina Martinez and Charles Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
