Cases 1 - 10 of 3,852
Guillen v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Marta P. Guillen
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mason v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 3:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Mason
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, John Does 1-10 and John Doe Corporations 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brooks v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv11540
Plaintiff:
Larhonda Brooks
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Greene v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (JRG2)
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Joy Greene
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Miller
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Merkel v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2024cv01625
Plaintiff:
Cecelia Merkel
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores East,LP et al
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East,LP and Walmart, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MITCHELL v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
as 1:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA MITCHELL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roehling et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Lora Roehling and Michael Roehling
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bundy v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 8:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Greg Bundy
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
