Cases 1 - 10 of 23
MCKNIGHT v. AMAZON.COM INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01449
Plaintiff:
JAMIE MCKNIGHT
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM INC., WALMART STORES INC. a/k/a WALMART, INC. d/b/a WALMART, TARGET CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Collopy, et al v. EBAY, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01575
Defendant:
EBAY, Inc., Dr. Entre, LLC, ZEP, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Collopy and Walter Collopy
Cross Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FOUSE v. EBAY INC.
as 2:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
KENDRA FOUSE
Defendant:
EBAY INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips et al v. Swagaway, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Shneur Zalman Phillips
Defendant:
Swagaway, LLC, Zake IP Holdings, LLC, Hoverzon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stone v. EBAY et al
as 5:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lamont Stone
Defendant:
EBAY, Microsoft, FNU Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ryan Tieszen v. LG Chem Ltd.
as 22-1110
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ryan Tieszen
Defendant:
eBay, Inc., Vapah, Inc. and First Doe through Thirtieth Doe
Defendant / Appellant:
LG Chem Ltd.
Teter v. Weaver Leather LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01445
Plaintiff:
John Teter
Defendant:
Weaver Leather LLC, eBay Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tieszen v. EBay, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv04002
Plaintiff:
Ryan Tieszen
Defendant:
Vapah, Inc., LG Chem America, Inc., LG Chem Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. eBay, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03459
Defendant:
Pierre Omidyar, Pamela Omidyar, eBay, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mueller v. Ebay, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02581
Plaintiff:
T. Mueller
Defendant:
Ebay, Inc. and Marisol Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
