Cases 61 - 70 of 104
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Coury
as 3:2018cv01854
Plaintiff:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Defendant:
David F. Coury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peacock v. Capital One Bank et al
as 9:2018cv80061
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Ivanivna Peacock
Defendant:
Capital One Bank and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Cutright v. Capital One NA et al
as 2:2017cv00342
Plaintiff:
Judith Cutright
Defendant:
Capital One NA and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HSBC Bank USA, National Association v. McKoy et al
as 1:2017cv06340
Defendant:
James N. McKoy, Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc., Criminal Court of the City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bolivar v. Nationwide Spas, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv05543
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bolivar
Defendant:
Nationwide Spas, Inc., Capital One, N.A. and Capital One Bank (USA), National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Wilson v. Capital One Bank USA NA
as 3:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
Marvin Wilson, Sr
Defendant:
Capital One Bank USA NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Clark
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Defendant:
James E. Clark
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CODY CREEK PARK, INC. v. CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01136
Plaintiff:
CODY CREEK PARK, INC.
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, LLC , CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, II , CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hassan Pejouhesh v. Capital One Bank
as 15-20114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HASSAN ALI PEJOUHESH
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPITAL ONE BANK
Fab-Tec, Inc. v. Capital One, N.A. et al
as 3:2014cv00630
Plaintiff:
Fab-Tec, Inc.
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A. , Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and Capital One Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
