Cases 71 - 78 of 78
Doctrine v. Equifirst Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv01389
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Doctrine
Defendant:
Equifirst Corporation, Equifirst Corporation, Charles Bradley and others
Counter Claimant:
H. Gilman Hudnall, Hudnall, Cohn, Fyvolent & Shaver, P.C. and W. Carlton Alford, Jr.
Counter Defendant:
Ambrose Doctrine, Ambrose Doctrine and Ambrose Doctrine
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Lindsey v. Woods et al
as 4:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
Charles Lindsey
Defendant:
John Woods, George Bush, United States Treasury, Department of and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cody v. Blue Grass Marketing Group, LLC et al
as 6:2008cv00439
Plaintiff:
Bob Cody
Defendant:
Blue Grass Marketing Group, LLC and Donna Bush
Cause Of Action: Diversity
StoneMor Operating, LLC et al v. Bush et al
as 1:2008cv00631
Plaintiff:
Lynnette Gray
Defendant:
Craig R. Bush, Mark Zausmer, Stephen J. Gobbo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Banks v. Sutherland et al
as 1:2008cv10880
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Sutherland, Jackson, Vernando and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peter Dunning, et al v. Gregory Bush, et al
as 07-2764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter B. Dunning, for himself and as representative and attonrey-in-fact for his grandchildren, David B. Dunning, Claire Baker and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Gregory J. Bush, Lawrence P. Bush, Joseph D. Bush and others
Irene Pang et al v. Aiquo Shi
as 2:2007cv02288
Plaintiff:
Irene Pang and George Bush
Defendant:
Aiquo Shi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Bush v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.
as 1:2007cv00321
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bush, Jeffrey Bush, Jeffrey Bush and others
Defendant:
Ameriquest Mortgage Company, Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc., AMC Mortgage Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
