Cases 91 - 100 of 984
Maddox v. Foley et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Clarice M Maddox
Defendant:
Mike Foley, Mary Kathrine Huffman, Timothy O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEWKIRK v. FISHBACK
as 4:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
CARLA NEWKIRK
Defendant:
ROBERT FISHBACK, JOHN GUY, RHASHA NEWKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 6:2023cv01010
Defendant:
Wichita Clinic, P.A., Klenda Mitchell Austerman Zuercher L.L.C., United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Carla Davis and Jalen Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2023cv05021
Plaintiff:
scott collins and Scott T Collins
Defendant:
Brian Smith, Carla Jacobi, Nathan West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv05022
Plaintiff:
Scott T Collins
Defendant:
Brian Smith, Carla Jacobi, Nathan West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv03283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
