Cases 91 - 100 of 196
Patty Jelsma, et al v. Knox County, TN, et al
as 16-6202
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PATTY JELSMA and SHANE JELSMA
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE and J. J. JONES, Individually and in his official capacity as a Sheriff of Knox County, Tennessee
Defendant - Appellant:
BRADLEY COX, Individually and In his official capacity as officer of the Knox County Sheriff's Department
Michael Nicholson et al v. City of Inglewood et al
as 2:2016cv01601
Defendant:
City of Inglewood and Does
Plaintiff:
M. I. N., Michael Nicholson, M. A. R. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016at00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bufford v. Keitt et al
as 1:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Trevis Kantrell Bufford
Defendant:
J. J. Keitt and T. A. Tellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Russell Walker v. J.P. Thomas & Co., Inc.
as 15-2520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL F. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF ABERDEEN and OFFICER J. J. SMITH
Defendant:
J.P. THOMAS & CO. INCORPORATED
Reagan et al v. Knox County Tennessee et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00536
Plaintiff:
Philip Reagan and State of Tennessee
Defendant:
Knox County Tennessee, J. J. Jones, Lake Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. County Of Galveston et al
as 3:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Sheila Renee Bell
Defendant:
County Of Galveston, Dwight D Sullivan, Secretary of State (Texas) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
