Cases 101 - 110 of 7,351
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kelly v. Salisbury et al
as 4:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Farrah Kelly
Defendant:
Christopher Salisbury and City of Williamsport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Douglas et al v. Walmart et al
as 7:2024cv03030
Plaintiff:
Willoughby Douglas and Lovecora Douglas
Defendant:
WALMART, Kelly G Moorer, Jr., Rory J Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dion Horton, et al v. Administrative Judge Jill Rangos, et al
as 24-1325
Plaintiff:
DION HORTON, DAMON JONES, CRAIG BROWNLEE and others
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE JILL RANGOS, in her official capacity, FRANK J. SCHERER, DIRECTOR OF ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE, in his official capacity, ANTHONY M. MARIANI, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUDGE and others
Trull et al v. Bond et al
as 6:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Michael Trull and B. Trull
Defendant:
Yolima Bond, Lillian SiFonte, Courtney Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Estate of Matthew Settles et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Matthew Settles and Brenda Settles
Defendant:
County of San Diego, William Gore, Kelly Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
