Cases 11 - 20 of 487
OSBORNE v. MCCORMICK
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
ALAN OSBORNE
Defendant:
CLAYTON ADKINSON, WILLIAM MCCORMICK and CLAY ADKINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATACCHIERO v. MCCORMICK
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
DAN MATACCHIERO
Defendant:
CLAY ADKINSON and WILLIAM MCCORMICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Richard McCormick, Jr.
as 24-1412
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE RICHARD E. MCCORMICK, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
McCormick v. Brock et al
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
James E McCormick
Defendant:
Michael Brock, Cassie Sullivan, Isaac Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Campbell v. Taveras et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Campbell
Defendant:
Leydi Taveras, Ms. Kesha Townsel, Mr. Waliek Crandal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Brentley, Jr. v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 23-3203
Plaintiff:
MARK BRENTLEY, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, MIKE GABLE, WILLIAM PEDUTO and others
Preston McCormick et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2023cv02569
Plaintiff:
Preston McCormick and EAST WIND AG
Defendant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, A MUNICIPAL ENTITY, Jeffrey Anthony Van Wagenen, Riverside County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
