Cases 11 - 20 of 24,253
Villecco v. Spesshardt
as 24-1250
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, in his official capacity as Director of the Division of Unemployment Insurance, Colorado Department of Labor and Employment
Villecco v. Spesshardt, et al
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, JOSEPH M. BARELA, CHER R. HAAVIND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Fisher v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
James Fisher
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, Jacksonville Sheriffs, J. C. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Marks v. North Saint Paul Police Dept. et al
as 0:2024cv02170
Plaintiff:
Marisa E Marks
Defendant:
North Saint Paul Police Dept., Saint Paul Police Dept. and Roseville Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Curtis Robinson v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv04710
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Oscar Rangel Salinas, MARK E RAMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
