Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Sproles v. Aramark Correctional Service
as 2:2016cv13327
Plaintiff:
Katrina Sproles
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Service
GRUNDY v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00400
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and MARION COUNTY SHERIFF
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GRUNDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROSADO v. ARAMARK et al
as 2:2014cv03033
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROSADO
Defendant:
ARAMARK , ARAMARK CORPORATION , ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES and others
Cross_claimant:
KALU , CORIZON HEALTH, INC. , JAMES ARNONE and others
Cross_defendant:
ARAMARK , ARAMARK CORPORATION , ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KENNEDY et al v. ARAMARK HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02678
Plaintiff:
CHAL D. KENNEDY, SR.
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC , WALTER FLAHERTY , VERONICA LEMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
King v. ARAMARK Correctional Services, LLC, et al
as 2:2012cv00473
Plaintiff:
Frank King
Defendant:
ARAMARK Correctional Services, LLC and Western Tidewater Regional Jail Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
