Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINS v. HOUSE et al
as 1:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
BONNY LOU BUZZELL HUTCHINS
Defendant:
KIRK R HOUSE, BRUCE A WILLIAMS, MELISSA J WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Vaughan v. Kentucky Army National Guard, et al
as 16-5686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN VAUGHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Aikens v. William Ingram, Jr.
as 14-2419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK AIKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM E. INGRAM, JR., individually and in his capacity as Adjutant General of the North Carolina Army National Guard and PETER VON JESS, individually and in his capacity as Lieutenant Colonel of the North Carolina National Guard
ROWLAND v. ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
as 1:2013cv01927
Plaintiff:
DAVONTA MELVIN ROWLAND
Defendant:
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martz v. Mississippi Army National Guard
as 3:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Michael Reed Martz
Defendant:
Mississippi Army National Guard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rainey v. Missouri Army National Guard et al
as 6:2013cv03028
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Rainey
Defendant:
Missouri Army National Guard , L Welty , A. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
v. Artiga et al
as 2:2012at01259
Defendant:
Victor Artiga, Merle Madera, Timothy D Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gregory Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ford v. Artiga et al
as 2:2012cv02370
Defendant:
Victor Artiga, Merle Madera, Timothy D. Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gregory Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
