Cases 11 - 20 of 478
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hucks v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
Savannah Hucks
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Crystal Ballard, Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Elad v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Elad
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Joshua Collins, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palakiko v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Carolann Hiaa Palakiko
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Oahu Correctional Community Center, State of Hawaii District Court (Waianae Division) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballard v. State of Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Mr. Stacey Ballard and Stacey Ballard
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ballard v. City of Wetumpka (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Stacey E. Ballard
Defendant:
City of Wetumpka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cressy et al v. California Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2023cv05201
Plaintiff:
William Floyd Cressy, Francisco Yanez, Nathan Delgado and others
Defendant:
California Department of Transportation, Tony Tavares, County of Sonoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WILLIAMS v. BALLARD et al
as 1:2023cv02985
Plaintiff:
DANIECE ERLIENE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL BALLARD, A. GUZMAN, P. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
