Cases 11 - 20 of 39
CENIZO GROUP LLC v. COGAN
as 5:2017cv00370
Plaintiff:
CENIZO GROUP LLC
Defendant:
CRAIG COGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Engel et al v. Gelernt et al
as 3:2017cv05127
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel and El Chapo Guzman
Defendant:
Michelle Gelernt, Michael Schneider and Judge Cogan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Engel et al v. Gelernt et al
as 3:2017cv05126
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel and El Chapo Guzman
Defendant:
Michelle Gelernt, Michael Schneider and Judge Cogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Lamone et al
as 1:2017cv02006
Plaintiff:
Judicial Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
Linda H. Lamone , David J. McManus, Jr. , Patrick J. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Ma'at El v. Doe
as 16-3767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Asirus Ma'at El, AKA C. Martin El
Defendant - Appellee:
Officer Norris Cardoza, City of New York, Officer Abul Chowdhury, Shield # 03375 and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Other and Other Accomplice
Schlakman et al v. Maryland State Board of Elections
as 1:2016cv02968
Plaintiff:
Ian Schlakman and Frank Richardson
Defendant:
Maryland State Board of Elections , David J. McManus, Patrick J. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White et al v. Mosby et al
as 1:2016cv02663
Plaintiff:
Alicia White and William Porter
Defendant:
Marilyn Mosby , Samuel Cogan and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sparaco v. Lamone et al
as 1:2016cv01579
Defendant:
Linda H. Lamone, David J. McManus, Jr., Patrick J. Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Dan Sparaco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarthy v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2015cv00709
Plaintiff:
Sara McCarthy
Defendant:
City of Syracuse , City of Syracuse Police Department and Ty Cogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARISTEO v. RAINES et al
as 1:2015cv04115
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant:
JODY RAINES, WEBMARCOM LLC, MICHELE MOKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
